1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 551 P.2d
  5. 551 P.2d 449 (1976)
 

GRILLO v. BURKE'S PAINT COMPANY, INC.

551 P.2d 449 (1976)

Robert GRILLO, Dba B-G Paint Co., Respondent, v. BURKE'S PAINT COMPANY, INC., a Washington Corporation, Respondent, E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, a Delaware Corporation, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided July 1, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cleveland C. Cory, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Clarence R. Wicks, and Davies, Biggs, Strayer, Stoel & Boley, Portland.

Edwin J. Peterson, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief for respondent Burke's Paint Company were E. Richard Bodyfelt, and Tooze, Kerr, Peterson, Marshall & Shenker, Portland, and Ronald L. Miller, Astoria, for respondent Grillo.

Before DENECKE, P.J., and HOLMAN, TONGUE, HOWELL and BRYSON, JJ.

HOWELL, Justice.

Plaintiff Grillo, doing business as B-G Paint Co., brought this action for damages against defendant Burke's Paint Company and defendant E.I. du Pont de Nemours (du Pont). Plaintiff had a contract with the State of Oregon to paint the Youngs Bay bridge in Clatsop County. Plaintiff purchased the paint from defendant Burke's, who had mixed it according to specifications which had been supplied to Burke's along with the specified pigment by defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases