The district court granted Woodbine's 41(b) motion (§ 21-1-1(41)(b) N.M.S.A. 1953) at the close of Deem's case, made findings of fact and conclusions of law and entered judgment in favor of the former.
Upon appeal, the Court of Appeals handed down an opinion authored by Sutin, J., in which Lopez, J. concurred and from which Hernandez, J. dissented, reversing the district court and remanding the case with directions. Deem v. Woodbine Manufacturing Company,...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
