OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Defendant was convicted of possession of heroin contrary to § 54-11-23(A), N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl.Vol. 8, pt. 2, 1973 Supp.). He appeals. We affirm.
The only question on appeal that merits consideration is defendant's claim that the trial court erroneously denied defendant's motion to suppress evidence seized from his person.
Defendant was arrested for public drunkenness. This occurred prior to repeal of the offense...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
