James R. HARSH, Plaintiff,
v.
CPC INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al., Defendants.
United States District Court, N. D. Texas, Amarillo Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 4, 1975.
June 4, 1975.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Joseph L. Alioto, Law Offices of Joseph L. Alioto, San Francisco, Cal., James W. Witherspoon, Witherspoon, Aikin, Langley, Woods & Gulley, Hereford, Tex., for plaintiff.
Robert J. Malinak and Theodore F. Weiss, Jr., Baker & Botts, Houston, Tex., Jerone W. Johnson, Underwood, Wilson, Sutton, Berry, Stein & Johnson, Amarillo, Tex., Thomas W. Johnston, Chadwell, Kayser, Ruggles, McGee, Hastings & McKinney, Chicago, Ill., Jay T. Holmes, Decatur, Ill., James E. Hastings, Chicago, Ill., Don H. Reavis, Culton, Morgan, Britain & White, Amarillo, Tex., Shidler, McBroom, Gates & Baldwin by James R. Irvin, Seattle, Wash., S. Tom Morris, Gibson, Ochsner, Adkins, Harlan & Hankins, Amarillo, Tex., Debevoise, Plimpton, Lyons & Gates, New York City, Robert H. Smith, Sanders, Saunders, Brian, Finney & Thomas, Amarillo, Tex., Mayer, Brown & Platt, Chicago, Ill., Richard E. Stokes, Jr., Stokes, Carnahan & Fields, Amarillo, Tex., Charles J. Calderini, Winston & Strawn, Chicago, Ill., A. J. Robinson, Robinson, Fotheringham & Simpson, Amarillo, Tex., Hall, McNicol, Marett & Hamilton, New York City, John C. Chambers, Stone, Stone & Chambers, Amarillo, Tex., Patrick E. Higginbotham, Coke & Coke, Dallas, Tex., George Whittenburg, the Whittenburg Law Offices, Amarillo, Tex., C. Henry Fraes, Jr., New York City, Raymond A. Cook and Edith H. Jones, Andrews, Kurth, Campbell & Jones, Houston, Tex., for defendants.
United States District Court, N. D. Texas, Amarillo Division.
MEMORANDUM
WOODWARD, District Judge.
The plaintiff is James R. Harsh, a citizen of Texas, who has filed his complaint in this court against the above named defendants praying for relief, both equitable and in the form of damages, against the defendants because of their alleged violations of the antitrust laws of the United States, to-wit: Sections 4, 12, and 16 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 15, 22, and 26) and Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
