1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 45 Cal.App.3d
  5. 45 Cal.App.3d 925 (1975)
 

TATE v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. 35894.

45 Cal.App.3d 925 (1975)

119 Cal. Rptr. 835

JAMES W. TATE, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent; CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

March 12, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Silverman, Ballard, Goldstein & Berenstein, Bruce S. Silverman and Paul J. Steiner for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Thomas M. O'Connor, City Attorney, and Edward J. Rothman, Deputy City Attorney, for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

MOLINARI, P.J.

Petitioner seeks a writ of mandate directing respondent court to set aside its dismissal of an action for damages for personal injuries. An alternative writ was issued by this court.

The complaint was filed on August 9, 1972. Real party in interest answered the complaint on August 24, 1972. Petitioner filed a memorandum on August 31, 1972, that the case was at issue, pursuant to rule 206 of the California...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases