1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 44 Cal.App.3d
  5. 44 Cal.App.3d 926 (1975)
 

ROEMER v. RETAIL CREDIT CO.

Docket No. 30888.

44 Cal.App.3d 926 (1975)

119 Cal. Rptr. 82

PAUL F. ROEMER, JR., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RETAIL CREDIT COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

January 29, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Cooper, White & Cooper, Charles W. Kenady, Robert R. Callan and Richard A. Seitz for Defendant and Appellant.

Burnhill, Morehouse & Burford, Clifford Burnhill and Cyril Viadro for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

KANE, J.

Defendant Retail Credit Company appeals for the second time from a jury verdict finding it guilty of libel and awarding plaintiff Paul Roemer, Jr., both compensatory and punitive damages. Judgment for plaintiff at the first trial of this action was reversed because of an erroneous instruction pertaining to the subject of malice (Roemer v. Retail Credit Co. (1970) 3 Cal.App.3d 368...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases