1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 49 Cal.App.3d
  5. 49 Cal.App.3d 917 (1975)
 

NORTON v. HINES

Docket No. 44731.

49 Cal.App.3d 917 (1975)

123 Cal. Rptr. 237

CHARLES R. NORTON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. LARRY L. HINES et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

July 15, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Stephen E. Lawton and Edward L. Lascher for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Nordman, Cormany, Hair & Compton, Robert L. Compton and James D. Daeschner for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

HASTINGS, J.

The first alleged cause of action of plaintiff Norton's complaint is for damages for malicious prosecution against Frank Lind (Lind), and the second alleged cause of action thereof is for damages for "professional negligence" by Larry L. Hines, an attorney, and Nordman, Cormany, Hair & Compton, the unincorporated law firm of which Hines is a member (both Hines and the law firm will be identified collectively...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases