1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 519 F.2d
  5. 519 F.2d 418 (1975)
 

BLANKENSHIP v. HEARST CORPORATION

No. 73-3163.

519 F.2d 418 (1975)

Harold D. BLANKENSHIP, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The HEARST CORPORATION, a corporation, William H. Myers, an individual, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

June 26, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Timothy H. Fine (argued), G. Joseph Bertain, Jr. and W. Thomas Amen, San Francisco, Cal., James J. Coyle, Thomas R. Sheridan, Simon & Sheridan; Wallace L. Rosvall, Murphy, Thornton, Hinerfeld & Cahill, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

Marvin Gelfand (argued), Philip M. Battaglia, Flint and MacKay, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

Before KILKENNY and TRASK, Circuit Judges, and RICH, Judge, United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

OPINION

TRASK, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal in a private antitrust action brought in the United States District Court for the Central District of California seeking injunctive relief and damages. The plaintiff and appellant is Harold D. Blankenship, an independent contractor for the purchase, distribution and sale of the Los Angeles Herald-Examiner newspaper. The defendants are the Hearst Corporation, publisher of the newspaper, and William H...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases