1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 391 F.Supp.
  5. 391 F.Supp. 538 (1975)
 

VAN ARSDALE v. CLAXTON

Civ. No. 74-566.

391 F.Supp. 538 (1975)

Alice VAN ARSDALE, Plaintiff, v. Robert R. CLAXTON et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. California.

March 10, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gerald J. O'Neill, of Higgs, Fletcher & Mack, San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff.

David H. Hayworth, in pro per.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

GORDON THOMPSON, Jr., District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendant David H. Hayworth's motion to dismiss filed pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jurisdiction for the underlying action is based upon alleged violations of the federal securities laws.1 For the reasons discussed below, the court must conclude that plaintiff's complaint should be dismissed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases