1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 50 Cal.App.3d
  5. 50 Cal.App.3d 856 (1975)
 

FORAKER v. O'BRIEN

Docket No. 44915.

50 Cal.App.3d 856 (1975)

124 Cal. Rptr. 110

EDWARD R. FORAKER et al, Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. THOMAS M. O'BRIEN, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

August 25, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Ball, Hunt, Hart, Brown & Baerwitz, Richard C. Goodman and Daniel W. Indelli for Defendant and Appellant.

McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Coyle & Wayte, James P. Wagoner and Oliver W. Wanger for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

COMPTON, J.

The court below after hearing on a motion by defendant Thomas O'Brien refused to dissolve a prejudgment attachment of defendant's property. Defendant appeals from the order denying his motion.

Understanding of defendant's contentions requires a brief description of the present procedure for obtaining prejudgment attachment in California. This procedure is the legislative response to judicial determination...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases