The court correctly determined that the tenant, respondent-appellant herein, violated a substantial obligation of his tenancy by carrying out the construction work, or alterations, in the premises without the landlord's permission or filing and obtaining approval of plans from the appropriate municipal department (see Freehold Investments v Richstone,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
RUMICHE CORP. v. EISENREICH
49 A.D.2d 856 (1975)
Rumiche Corp., Respondent, v. Charles Eisenreich, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 23, 1975
October 23, 1975
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
