Order dated September 3, 1974 reversed insofar as reviewed, without costs, motion granted, and proceeding dismissed.
Since the demand for arbitration was served by ordinary mail, the method of service did not satisfy the requirements of CPLR 7503 (subd. [c]) that such a demand must be served in the same manner as a summons, or by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested. Accordingly, it was null and void and the application to stay arbitration should...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.