IN RE FAMULARO


67 N.J. 20 (1975)

334 A.2d 331

IN THE MATTER OF HUMPHREY FAMULARO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 18, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Frederick C. Vonhof argued the cause for the Essex County Ethics Committee.

Mr. John W. Noonan argued the cause for respondent.


PER CURIAM.

In this disciplinary matter the Essex County Ethics Committee, following a hearing at which respondent appeared and testified, found that respondent willfully and knowingly failed to represent his client zealously and failed to fulfill the contract of employment for professional services to the prejudice of his client.

The facts as found by the Committee are not controverted and are as follows: Respondent was retained by the defendant-wife in a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases