1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 389 F.Supp.
  5. 389 F.Supp. 486 (1975)
 

RICHMOND ELKS HALL ASS'N v. RICHMOND REDEVEL. AGCY.

No. C-72-2275.

389 F.Supp. 486 (1975)

RICHMOND ELKS HALL ASSOCIATION, a California Corporation, Plaintiff, v. RICHMOND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY and the City of Richmond, Defendants.

United States District Court, N. D. California.

February 19, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jackson, Turner & Mulcare, Burlingame, Cal., and Bold & Polisner, Walnut Creek, Cal., for plaintiff.

James T. Johnson of Fitzgerald & Johnson, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LITIGATION EXPENSES AND AWARDING PLAINTIFF COSTS OF SUIT

WOLLENBERG, District Judge.

Plaintiff brought this inverse condemnation action against Defendant Richmond Redevelopment Agency under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.1 On September 17, 1974, this Court filed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as to all Issues, Save...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases