We do not disagree with the sentiments expressed in the dissent, insofar as they are based on the facts in the record presently before the court. However, the majority would afford to third-party plaintiff, Harnischfeger Corporation, the right to disclosure proceedings limited to those facts bearing upon jurisdiction, including whether or not appellant is insured by a New York carrier or carriers. (CPLR 3211, subd. [d]; see, also, Seider v Roth,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.