1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 388 F.Supp.
  5. 388 F.Supp. 470 (1975)
 

UNITED STATES v. HAYES

Crim. A. No. 74-191.

388 F.Supp. 470 (1975)

UNITED STATES of America v. William Edward HAYES, Jr., and Patrick Edward Mertens.

United States District Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.

January 28, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard L. Thornburgh, U. S. Atty., Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff.

Andrew J. Conner, Erie, Pa., for defendant Hayes.

Theodore B. Ely, III, Erie, Pa., for defendant Patrick Mertens.

OPINION

WEBER, District Judge.

Defendants William Edward Hayes, Jr. and Patrick Edward Mertens have filed motions for a new trial following their convictions on the conspiracy count and all substantive counts as charged in the indictment. Many of the grounds pleaded in these motions had been considered and ruled on at a previous stage of these proceedings in pretrial motions and hearings. Upon reconsideration of each of the defendants' claims we find no...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases