1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.2d
  4. 89 Misc.2d
  5. 89 Misc.2d 763 (1975)
 

MTR OF URBAN RENEWAL v. BUCCI

89 Misc.2d 763 (1975)

In the Matter of Schenectady Urban Renewal Agency, Petitioner, v. Earl M. Bucci et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Schenectady County.

May 8, 1975

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James P. Houlihan and Harold E. Blodgett for petitioner. DeGraff, Foy, Conway & Holt-Harris (William F. Conway and Michael G. Breslin of counsel), for respondents.

JAMES GIBSON, J.

This proceeding was commenced in the County Court of Schenectady County and upon the certificate of the Judge of the County Court of his disqualification was, by stipulation of the parties and by order of the Supreme Court, duly transferred to the Supreme Court; and, pursuant to the order of the Administrative Judge, was brought on for hearing before the undersigned Justice; was tried on January...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases