STATE v. BRIM

No. 7517SC115.

214 S.E.2d 622 (1975)

25 N.C. App. 709

STATE of North Carolina v. Joe Lee BRIM and Douglas Sands.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 21, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Asst. Atty. Gen. Charles M. Hensey and Associate Atty. C. Diederich Heidgerd, Raleigh, for the State.

Gwyn, Gwyn, & Morgan by Melzer A. Morgan, Jr., Reidsville, for defendant Brim.

Clyde C. Randolph, Jr., and Doris G. Randolph, Winston-Salem, for defendant Sands.


PARKER, Judge.

Defendant Brim's Appeal

In his first assignment of error defendant Brim contends that the trial court did not instruct the jury adequately on the doctrine of possession of recently stolen property. More specifically, he asserts that the trial court should have discussed the limitations of this presumption and should have given to the jury his contention that he obtained the stolen goods honestly by taking them in pawn from the man in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases