After a snow storm, the roof collapsed. Plaintiffs brought this action based in negligence to recover the amount paid to defendant for repair of the roof. After trial, the jury found for plaintiffs in an amount stipulated to by the parties. This appeal ensued. Both parties offered expert testimony as to the cause of the collapse of the roof. Defendant's chief objection at the trial and on this appeal is that plaintiffs' expert was improperly permitted to testify because he...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
