Among other things, the board found that the claimant had engaged in gambling activities upon the premises of his employer, a bank. The record contains substantial evidence to support the findings of the board. The board, however, in its decision utilized the now discredited doctrine of provoked discharge as a basis for claimant's disqualification from benefits. (See Matter of James [Levine],
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.