OPINION BY PRICE, J., December 11, 1975:
Because these appeals involve the same issue, which is whether the sanctions imposed by the lower court following the appellant's adjudications of civil contempt were proper, they were consolidated for purposes of oral argument. The merits of both appeals will be determined in this opinion.
The facts which precipitated the citation for contempt now appealed at No. 42 April Term, 1976 may be summarized
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.