PER CURIAM.
The appellant was found guilty by a jury of robbery, was adjudged in accordance with the verdict and sentenced to ten years in prison. On this appeal the only substantial point argued is whether the trial court erred in denying appellant's motions for judgment of acquittal.
Appellant argues that he was entitled to acquittal because of the two eye witnesses, one who identified him and the other who stated that he was not the robber. The judgment...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
