Judgment affirmed.
No opinion.
Defendant offered testimony tending to show that at the time of the commission of the crimes charged he was acting involuntarily, under the influence of LSD. The trial court instructed the jury as to the effect of voluntary intoxication. This was prejudicial error. The jury should have been instructed that...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.