Judgment affirmed, with costs.
The determination of the planning board was neither arbitrary nor capricious. The petition does not refute on the merits 14 of 16 of the board's objections to the application. Appellant's contention that the various revisions suggested by the board, prior to the public hearing, are in fact modifications requiring an approval lacks merit. The recommendations made by the board prior to a public hearing were merely suggestions to assist...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.