Order affirmed, with costs. It is enough to say that the manufacturer was under no duty to foresee that a child of tender years, six in this case, would have been present in and endangered by the type of farm machine involved, a railroad car-sized "unloader wagon" and its exposed internal components.
I dissent because I believe that a quarter century of experience with the patent-danger rule has demonstrated beyond...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
