1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 273 Md.
  5. 273 Md. 522 (1975)
 

BOSWELL v. PRINCE GEORGE'S CTY.

[No. 78, September Term, 1974.]

273 Md. 522 (1975)

330 A.2d 663

BOSWELL v. PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided January 16, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Morris Topf, with whom were Stanbury & Topf on the brief, for appellant.

Michael O. Connaughton, Associate County Attorney, with whom was Joseph S. Casula, County Attorney, on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and SINGLEY, SMITH, DIGGES, LEVINE, ELDRIDGE and O'DONNELL, JJ.

SMITH, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Landowners when faced with a proposed acquisition of their land for public improvements, whether by way of easement or in fee simple, have often suggested to the courts that they saw a better way to do the improvement than that proposed by the condemning authority. See, e.g., Director v. Oliver Beach Imp. Ass'n, 259 Md. 183,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases