1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Super.
  4. 233 Pa.Super.
  5. 233 Pa.Super. 562 (1975)
 

NAT'L CASH REG. CO. v. HAAK, et al.

233 Pa.Super. 562 (1975)

The National Cash Register Company, Appellant, v. Haak, et al.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

March 31, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Paul Kershner, with him Christopher W. Mattson, and Barley, Snyder, Cooper & Mueller, for appellant.

Robert L. Brabson, with him Windolph, Burkholder & Hartman, for appellee, Eva L. Haak, Executrix.

Alfred C. Alspach, with him Alspach & Ryder, for appellee, S. Dale Kaufman.

Before WATKINS, P.J., JACOBS, HOFFMAN, CERCONE, PRICE, VAN DER VOORT, and SPAETH, JJ.

OPINION BY SPAETH, J., March 31, 1975:

This is an appeal from the denial of appellant's motion to take off a compulsory nonsuit. In reviewing the record in such a case we must give appellant the benefit of all favorable evidence and reasonable inferences of fact. Shirley v. Clark, 441 Pa. 508, 271 A.2d 868 (1970); Murray v. Siegal, 413 Pa. 23, 195 A.2d 790 (1963). So viewed, the evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases