1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 264 S.C.
  5. 264 S.C. 529 (1975)
 

STATE v. ALLEN

20033

264 S.C. 529 (1975)

216 S.E.2d 189

The STATE, Respondent, v. Ray ALLEN and Joe Edward POWELL, Appellants.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

June 11, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard G. Dusenbury, Esq., of Florence, for Appellants.

Messrs. Daniel R. McLeod, Atty. Gen., and Kenneth P. Woodington, Staff Atty., of Columbia, and T. Kenneth Summerford, Sol., for Respondent.

June 11, 1975.

NESS, Justice:

Appellants were charged with grand larceny. They were tried and convicted of the charges and now appeal, contending, first, that the evidence produced by the State was insufficient to support the verdict.

They argue that when the State's case rests upon circumstantial evidence, the prosecution must negate every possible inference of innocence which might flow from the evidence.

We have held that if there is any...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases