PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks reversal of his conviction after a jury trial on charges of robbery for which he was sentenced to twenty years.
We have heard oral argument in this cause and have carefully examined the record on appeal and the briefs submitted by the parties. Upon our consideration thereof, we conclude that appellant has failed to demonstrate that prejudicial error was committed in the trial court, both with respect
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.