MATTER OF ROSENBLATT v. JIUDICE


47 A.D.2d 721 (1975)

In the Matter of Albert M. Rosenblatt, as District Attorney of Dutchess County, Petitioner, v. Joseph Jiudice, as Judge of the Dutchess County Court, Respondent. William Abruzzi, Intervenor-Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

January 13, 1975


On the court's own motion, its decision dated January 2, 1975 is amended by adding thereto the following: In our opinion, the respondent Judge would have been well advised to reserve decision on the motion to suppress to afford the District Attorney an opportunity on the trial to establish the admissibility of the seized photographs, etc. Under the circumstances, we assume that, if a motion for reargument be made in the County Court, it will be granted to the extent herein...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases