1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 50 Cal.App.3d
  5. 50 Cal.App.3d 704 (1975)
 

DABIS v. SAN FRANCISCO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

Docket No. 34731.

50 Cal.App.3d 704 (1975)

122 Cal. Rptr. 800

ANIS DABIS et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. SAN FRANCISCO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

August 19, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Garry, Dreyfus, McTernan, Brotsky, Herndon & Pesonen, Allan Brotsky and Ruth M. Friedman for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Henry F. Davis, Michael A. Di Santo, and Richard M. Thomas for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

THE COURT.*

Dabis, the owners of adjacent private property, appeal from an order granting the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency's motion for a new trial on grounds of an error of law in an instruction, after a jury returned a verdict of $6,500 in Dabis' action for property damages. The agency contends that the order granting the new trial was proper as section 7211.1 of the Urban Renewal Handbook...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases