KAPILOFF v. LOCKE

[No. 14, September Term, 1975.]

276 Md. 466 (1975)

348 A.2d 697

KAPILOFF v. LOCKE ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided December 22, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Argued and reargued by Marvin H. Schein, with whom was Stanley Lustman on the brief, for appellant.

Argued and reargued by James J. Dawson, with whom were Morton A. Sacks and Cable, McDaniel, Bowie & Bond on the brief, for appellees.

The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and SINGLEY, SMITH, DIGGES and ELDRIDGE, JJ., and reargued before MURPHY, C.J., and SINGLEY, SMITH, DIGGES and ELDRIDGE, JJ., and CHARLES E. ORTH, JR., Chief Judge of the Court of Special Appeals and JAMES C. MORTON, JR., Associate Judge of the Court of Special Appeals, specially assigned.


ELDRIDGE, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. SMITH and ORTH, JJ., dissent and filed a dissenting opinion at page 474 infra.

In this case we are concerned with whether the admission into evidence of two letters violated the hearsay rule, and, if so, whether the error was prejudicial.

Grinnell W. Locke and Richard N. Jackson, Jr., partners doing business as Locke and Jackson, Architects, entered into a contract with The Equitable Trust Company of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases