1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.2d
  4. 36 N.Y.2d
  5. 36 N.Y.2d 704 (1975)
 

MATTER OF SCRANTON v. SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

36 N.Y.2d 704 (1975)

In the Matter of Agnes Scranton, Appellant, v. Supreme Court of the State of New York et al., Respondents. (Two Proceedings.)

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided February 27, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eleanor Jackson Piel for appellant.

Richard H. Kuh, District Attorney (Jonathan Lovett and Lewis R. Friedman of counsel), respondent pro se.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Samuel A. Hirshowitz and David H. Berman of counsel), for Justices of Supreme Court, respondents.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur in memorandum.

MEMORANDUM.

The judgments of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs. A claim of a denial of a speedy trial is not cognizable in an application pursuant to CPLR article 78 for a judgment prohibiting a District Attorney and the Justices of the Supreme Court from proceeding on an indictment. (Matter of Watts v. Supreme Ct. of State of N. Y., 28 N.Y.2d 714; Matter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases