Judgment affirmed.
Defendant claims, inter alia, that the second count of the indictment charged him with the illegal possession of a 1965 Oldsmobile and that, with regard to that count, no proof was elicited at trial. He argues, therefore, that his conviction of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, which resulted from the said second count, must be reversed and that the count itself should be dismissed. While defendant is correct with...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
