FORT, Judge.
Defendant challenges his conviction by a jury of the crime of conspiracy to commit theft. ORS 161.450. His principal contention is that the court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal.
The property charged to be the subject of the conspiracy was a dog named Dobra. There was evidence that in 1970 defendant, who owned Dobra at that time, was a trainer, exhibitor, handler and breeder of registered dogs, and that he sold Dobra as a...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
