1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 511 F.2d
  5. 511 F.2d 225 (1975)
 

PREMIUM SERVICE CORP. v. SPERRY & HUTCHINSON CO.

No. 73-2217.

511 F.2d 225 (1975)

PREMIUM SERVICE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The SPERRY & HUTCHINSON COMPANY, Defendant, George A. Scott, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

February 6, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Bodner, Jr. (argued), Howrey, Simon, Baker & Murchison, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff-appellant.

Michael L. Kirby (argued), Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps, San Diego, Cal., for appellee.

Alan R. Wentzel (argued), Casey, Lane & Mittendorf, New York City, for defendant.

Before KOELSCH and CHOY, Circuit Judges, and MARKEY, United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

OPINION

CHOY, Circuit Judge:

Premium Service Corporation is engaged in antitrust litigation against the Sperry & Hutchinson Company (S&H) in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. S&H is charged with unlawfully monopolizing and attempting to monopolize segments of the trading stamp market. Premium Service is attempting to show that, as part of this alleged scheme, S&H has offered one of its customers, Walker-Scott...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases