ROGUE RIVER VALLEY IRRIGATION DISTRICT, Petitioner,
v.
EMPLOYMENT DIVISION, Ross Morgan, Administrator, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued and Submitted February 18, 1975.
Decided April 14, 1975.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Frank J. Van Dyke, Medford, and William Ganong, Jr., Klamath Falls, argued the cause for petitioner. On the brief were Van Dyke, DuBay, Robertson & Paulson, P.C., and Frank J. Van Dyke, Medford.
John W. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Atty. Gen., and W. Michael Gillette, Sol. Gen., Salem.
Henigson, Stunz & Fonda and Stephen B. Fonda, Nyssa, filed a brief amicus curiae.
Panner, Johnson, Marceau & Karnopp, C. Montee Kennedy, Lyman C. Johnson and Owen M. Panner, Bend, filed a brief amicus curiae on behalf of North Unit Irrigation District and Tumalo Irrigation District.
Before LANGTRY, P.J., and FOLEY and LEE, JJ.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
LANGTRY, Presiding Judge.
This appeal is the third of companion cases. See Klamath Irr. Dist. v. Employ. Div., Or. App., 534 P.2d 190 (1975), and Talent Irr. Dist. v. Employ. Div., Or. App., 534 P.2d 199 (1975). The petitioner irrigation district in this case was organized and exists, as do the others, under ORS ch. 545. The Employment Division had determined, as with the others, that petitioner...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.