TALENT IRRIGATION DISTRICT, Petitioner,
v.
EMPLOYMENT DIVISION, Ross Morgan, Administrator, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued and Submitted February 18, 1975.
Decided April 14, 1975.
Rehearing Denied June 11, 1975.
Review Denied June 24, 1975.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Fred J. Amundson, Medford, and William Ganong, Jr., Klamath Falls, argued the cause for petitioner. On the brief were Blackhurst, Hornecker & Hassen and Fred J. Amundson, Medford.
John W. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Atty. Gen., and W. Michael Gillette, Sol. Gen., Salem.
Henigson, Stunz & Fonda and Stephen B. Fonda, Nyssa, filed a brief amicus curiae.
Panner, Johnson, Marceau & Karnopp, C. Montee Kennedy, Lyman C. Johnson and Owen M. Panner, Bend, filed a brief amicus curiae on behalf of North Unit Irrigation District and Tumalo Irrigation District.
Before LANGTRY, P.J., and FOLEY and LEE, JJ.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
LANGTRY, Presiding Judge.
This is a companion appeal to Klamath Irr. Dist. v. Employ. Div., Or. App., 534 P.2d 190 (1975), decided pursuant to the same law. With the exception of the exact percentage of its total water that the respective irrigation districts deliver for nonfarm purposes, the essential facts are the same. Summarizing the facts found by the referee, it appears that between 90 and 95 percent of all of the water the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
