On this appeal defendant contends that (1) it was improper to proceed with a joint trial of the drug charges with the bribery charge; (2) he was prejudiced by the prosecution's reading of the indictment to the jury when two of its counts were ultimately dismissed for lack of proof; (3) the prosecution failed to produce, as a witness, an informer whose testimony would have been helpful to him; and (4) the sentence was excessive. All of the counts in the indictment were properly...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
