Appellant raises two issues on this appeal, the first of which involves the trial court's refusal to adjourn the proceeding to allow appellant to produce certain witnesses. He also contends that the evidence was insufficient to establish his paternity. Specifically, he maintains that medical testimony was required as to the probable date of conception. Petitioner testified that she had sexual intercourse with appellant for the first time on April 2, 1973. The baby was born...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
