KOLBECK v. RURAL MUT. INS. CO.

No. 516 (1974).

70 Wis.2d 655 (1975)

235 N. W. 2d 466

KOLBECK and wife, Respondents, v. RURAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided November 25, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Terwilliger, Wakeen, Piehler, Conway & Rouse, S. C., attorneys, and W. Thomas Terwilliger of counsel, all of Wausau, and oral argument by Douglas Klingberg of Wausau.

For the respondents there was a brief by Kelley, Weber & Bolte, S. C. of Wausau, and oral argument by Richard Bolte.


HANLEY, J.

The following issues are raised on this appeal:

1. Did Kolbeck comply with a policy provision regarding notice to the insurer and to law enforcement agencies of an occurrence which may give rise to a claim for theft?

2. Was it error for the trial court to consider testimony on the discovery of the calf carcass?

3. Was there sufficient proof under the policy requirements to sustain judgment for the insured?

4. Was the measure...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases