1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.2d
  4. 36 N.Y.2d
  5. 36 N.Y.2d 679 (1975)
 

PUTNINS CONTRACTING CORP. v. WINSTON WOODS AT DIX HILLS, INC.

36 N.Y.2d 679 (1975)

Putnins Contracting Corporation et al., Respondents, v. Winston Woods at Dix Hills, Inc. et al., Defendants, and L. R. 1826 et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided February 13, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Seymour B. Walzer and Alan C. Levy for appellants.

Ira L. Hyams for respondents.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur in Per Curiam opinion.

Per Curiam.

We recognize that there are similarities between abandonment and completion of improvements which fall within the ambit of article 3-A of the Lien Law and that one might expect in the careful specification of that article to find explicit provision as to applicable periods of limitations for all situations. Nonetheless we, too, conclude that the one-year Statute of Limitations of subdivision 2 of section 77 is not applicable where there is abandonment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases