JOHNSON, Judge.
The appeal in this case contends that the trial court was in error in charging the jury on contributory negligence and comparative negligence resulting in the reduction of the jury verdict for damages.
Appellant contends that there were no facts from which the trial court could have found contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff-appellant, and therefore it was error to even charge on the question.
We find from the record...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
