Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial ordered. No determination has been made with respect to the facts.
The trial court erred in its failure to require disclosure of the identity of a police informant. A police officer testified that he, in the company of the informant, went to an apartment where he arranged to purchase a large quantity of marijuana from defendant. Another person, one Tintle, was arrested in another room of the apartment. Defendant testified...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
