MINSK v. BALTIMORE & OHIO R.R.


48 A.D.2d 649 (1975)

Gerald Minsk et al., Respondents, v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad et al., Appellants-Respondents, and John Carter et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants, Coastal Dry Dock & Repair Corp., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. San-Min Maintenance & Contracting Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent, et al., Third-Party Defendant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 29, 1975


If the plaintiffs-respondents consent to the reductions, the judgment as so amended and reduced, including the apportionment of damages, is unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements.

The amounts awarded by the jury were excessive and a judgment exceeding the amounts indicated is not warranted on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases