STATE v. ACOSTA

No. 2 CA-CR 600.

25 Ariz. App. 44 (1975)

540 P.2d 1263

The STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Ruben Joseph ACOSTA, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

October 10, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce E. Babbitt, Atty. Gen. by John S. O'Dowd, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tucson, for appellee.

Auerbach & Freeman by Albert G. Freeman, Jr., Tucson, for appellant.


OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

Appellant seeks reversal of an order revoking his probation on the ground that Rule 27, Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S., was not complied with. In particular, he contends that (1) he was not given a copy of written conditions of probation, as required by Rule 27.1, and (2) the court did not inform him at the beginning of the revocation hearing that he might be tried for the offense upon which the alleged violation was based...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases