E.M. CONSUMER CORP. v. CHRISTENSEN

Docket No. 33436.

47 Cal.App.3d 642 (1975)

121 Cal. Rptr. 177

E.M. CONSUMER CORPORATION et al., Plaintiffs and Appellant, v. C.B. CHRISTENSEN, as Director, etc., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

April 1, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Sanford N. Diller for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General, Carl Boronkay, Assistant Attorney General, Roderick Walston and Richard C. Jacobs, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent.

Steck & Marston and Emil Steck, Jr., as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

KANE, J.

This is an appeal from the lower court's judgment denying appellants' petition for writ of mandate and declaring that the marketing order of respondent Director of Agriculture1 of the State of California ("Director") is constitutional and valid as applied to appellants. The background facts may be stated as follows:

On July 31, 1972...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases