WHITE v. WHITE


136 N.J. Super. 552 (1975)

347 A.2d 360

CHARLES EVANS WHITE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CATHERINE WHITE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 24, 1975.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ms. Catherine White, appellant, argued the cause pro se (Messrs. Mutnick, Gast & White, attorneys).

Mr. Gray N. Skoloff argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Skoloff & Wolfe, attorneys; Mr. Richard H. Singer on the brief).

Before Judges HALPERN, CRANE and MICHELS.


The opinion of the court was delivered by MICHELS, J.A.D.

A review of the record discloses substantial credible evidence to reasonably warrant the findings and conclusions of the trial judge that (1) defendant wife was not entitled to alimony; (2) plaintiff husband's future right to retirement income under a noncontributory pension plan provided by his employer was not subject to equitable distribution; (3) the sum of $2,366 accumulated in plaintiff's employment savings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases