1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 69 Wis.2d
  5. 69 Wis.2d 616 (1975)
 

SYKES v. STATE

No. State 201.

69 Wis.2d 616 (1975)

230 N.W.2d 760

SYKES, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 30, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error the cause was submitted on the brief of Laurence E. Norton II of the Legal Aid Society of Milwaukee.

For the defendant in error the cause was submitted on the brief of Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and James H. Bailey, assistant attorney general.

Submitted under sec. (Rule) 251.54 June 5, 1975.

HANLEY, J.

Two issues are presented on appeal:

1. Was there sufficient evidence presented to sustain the trial court's findings?

2. Should a new trial be granted in the interest of justice?

Sufficiency of the evidence.

The defendant argues that the record does not contain sufficient credible evidence to prove the defendant's guilt...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases