The alleged contempt consisted of having failed to carry out a certain agreement, entered into under the auspices of the Family Court and pursuant to the provisions of an earlier order. The provisions of the agreement were never implemented by any order of the court and their violation cannot, therefore, provide the basis for adjudication of contempt. (See Judiciary Law, § 53, subd 3; Kolmer v Kolmer,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.